March 24, 2017

Most construction folks in Florida know that to lien a job, the lienor must file its lien within 90 days of ….something.  An unpaid lienor usually starts focusing on this question sometime after its pay application hasn’t been paid for a month or so – not later, we hope.

In fact, the lien must be recorded in the public records – filed with the clerk in the county where the property worked on is located – “not later than 90 days after the final furnishing of labor or services or materials by the lienor.”

713.08  (5) The claim of lien may be recorded at any time during the progress of the work or thereafter but not later than 90 days after the final furnishing of the labor or services or materials by the lienor.

A lien filed after the 90th day is invalid, and may expose the lienor to liability to the owner for attorneys’ fees and damages.  See e.g. Sam Rodgers Props. v. Chmura, 61 So. 3d 432, 436 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) describing (but reversing) trial court’s holding that lien filed 168 days after last performance of work was “fraudulent and unenforceable”.   Filing on time is a big deal, not just because a late filing blows the lienor’s lien rights.  Filing late and hoping for the best is not cost free.

In a recent matter we handle, the general contractor and a lienor subcontractor disagreed what date the subcontractor last performed work.  The general contractor responded to the lien by arguing its job logs showed the last record of the lienor being on the job was several days before the date of final furnishing asserted in the lien, and would have put the lien out past the 90th day.  So the question becomes:  in your day to day construction operations, would you have evidence to prove what the date of “final furnishing” was?

In our matter, the lienor had skillfully created and kept text messages with photos of work with the date and time embedded in the text message.  However, offering a text message or an email opens up the entire content of all emails or an electronic device to scrutiny, which creates some risk.

In Best Drywall Servs. v. Blaszczyk, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15865, the lienor had to testify at trial to prove its lien.  The lienor’s president had to testify to the date of final furnishing (because while the lien is a recorded document, the lien itself is not proof for purposes of trial of the events described in the lien).  A living human being has to offer competent testimony to prove each element of the lien.  Unfortunately for the lienor, human beings get nervous and forgetful under pressure, and testifying at trial is pressure.  The company’s president struggled on the witness stand, and testified to five different dates of final furnishing – including two which would have made the lien late.  The court found that, despite the contradictory testimony, the jury could decide which of the five dates it believed, and whether the lien was timely.

It’s better to offer written or photographic business record into evidence, than have to coach a witness who’s nervous and bad with dates.  Other sources of proof might be delivery tickets, employee time records, dispatch tickets or reports sending an employee to the job, toll records (for an exit near the jobsite), or even a credit card bill entry for a nearby lunch spot.  Of course, these kinds of records can go both ways.  The question is, what direct, or circumstantial, evidence will make a jury of six people believe the lienor did, or didn’t, have someone working on the job that day, in the face of a GC’s job log that shows otherwise?  And how can the lienor – who on the date of last furnishing probably doesn’t know there’s going to be a payment problem – maintain the focus to create and preserve the evidence of the work?

An unreliable fix for a late lienor that some have tried is to come back and do some punch list or warranty work, to try to start the 90 day clock running anew.  However, the lien law says this won’t work:

713.01(12) “Final furnishing” means the last date that the lienor furnishes labor, services, or materials. Such date may not be measured by other standards, such as the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or the issuance of a certificate of final completion, and does not include correction of deficiencies in the lienor’s previously performed work or materials supplied. With respect to rental equipment, the term means the date that the rental equipment was last on the job site and available for use.”

Note that the date of final furnishing is not “measured” by the date of the c.o. or “other standards,” but by actual performance of work, which is not corrective of “previously performed” work.

Florida courts have consistently held that corrective work or warranty work does not create a new, later date to restart the 90 day clock.  “After the installation of fixtures or equipment in a building, later services in the nature of correction or repair are not regarded as a part of the installation so as to make the time within which to file under a mechanic’s lien based on the original installation run from the time of performance of such later services.”  391 So. 2d 302, 303 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

But what if the “correction” is doing work that wasn’t done and was therefore also necessary to “complete” the contract – like leaving a doorknob off.  In Viking, after the HVAC work was in place and operating, and after owner occupancy, it was necessary to add weep holes to drain the HVAC system, and move a thermostat.  Presumably weep holes to drain HVAC condensate is work that was required, but not done, and was therefore necessary to “complete” the job, and not merely “correct” the work.  The philosopher Zeno could have confused undergraduates for generations asking whether a missing door knob, or weep holes, is work that is not “complete,” or “corrective”.”  In logic, and in the real world, these categories overlap.  The court in Viking pushed this logic aside, noting the weep hole addition work was trivial and distant in time.  The point here is, despite the logical argument that work not “complete” may also be “collectively” repaired, the courts are not buying this logic:

In this case, at the request of the owners, the contractor also returned to the job site in 1978 to install weep holes and had a subcontractor move a thermostat. These items were also to correct or ratify conditions or to eliminate problems resulting from work under the original contract. In addition, as compared to the whole contract work, they were too remote in time and too unsubstantial and too trivial in quantity to extend the time for filing.

     Viking, 391 So.2d at 303.  The Viking court called down precedents where a vendor of 64,700 tons of steel made a later 17 pound delivery to try to restart the 90 days (People’s Bank of Jacksonville v. Virginia Bridge & Iron Co., 94 Fla. 474, 113 So. 680 (1927)), and where an electrician added a single conduit 5 months after “completion” (Finney v. Barber Block Plant, Inc., 183 So.2d 698 (Fla.  2d DCA 1966)).  The court bolted a “triviality” standard on the test for final furnishing, to thwart the lienor’s “completion, not merely correction” argument.   The lienor in Viking made a compelling argument that the owner might not find the lack of an essential, omitted electrical conduit so trivial, when the owner bargained for it.  The court rejected this position because the weep holes were “of comparable insignificance when compared to the total contract work as to not extend the time for filing the contractor’s claim, notwithstanding that the owner insisted that he was entitled to such work under the construction contract.”  Id. at 304.

The triviality standard doesn’t appear in Sec. 713.01(11)’s definition of final furnishing, but the courts have followed it.  The point is that minor corrective or warranty work – or work which is minor, trivial, but ambiguous in nature, like adding an omitted part of the work – is an unreliable tactic to extend the 90 days to file a lien.

A lienor who has blown the 90 days might search the contract scope, specifications, or change orders for work which is, as shown by the contract documents, to be part of the contract, and seemingly substantive and nontrivial, to complete.  The possible tactic here is to find an omitted, substantive performance – perhaps an ambiguity or an omission – that better fits the real two prong test of “completion” and “nontriviality”.  Another alternative: a change order to add work to the existing contract on terms so favorable the GC and/or owner can’t refuse.  These approaches are untested.  We recommend:

  1. The lienor should focus on when the last date of substantive performance was;
  2. Document the evidence of the type of performance and date;
  3. Invite the owner or GC to agree in writing by an e mail or letter advising that the lienor has last performed on the date;
  4. Keep alerts on the calendar.
  5. Focus not later than 60 days after the date of last performance on the status of payment.

A good lawyer can usually get a lien filed on the last day, but problems like traffic jams, computer crashes and missing information may thwart even heroic efforts.  As with turning on homework, why wait till the last minute?



Board-Certified Construction Lawyer Andrew Showen spoke at NASTT

Board certified construction lawyer Andrew Showen of Hill Rugh Keller & Main spoke at the North American Society for Trenchless Technology (NASTT) annual convention in Portland, Oregon in May 2023.  Andy discussed the results of a Manatee County


State Of Florida Starts Receivership Proceedings Against Fednat Insurance Company

On September 23, 2022, the Florida Department of Insurance filed a petition to place FedNat Insurance Co. in receivership. The petition alleges that FedNat acknowledged in September 2022 that it did not have enough cash on hand to meet its current ob


Florida Special Legislative Session Amendment To Building Code “25% Rule” Impacts Roofers, Homeowners And Insurers

Building owners needing repairs on a portion of their building are often chagrined to discover that they must pay for an entirely new assembly, because of the “25% rule”.  This was a requirement in the Florida Building Code (2017 Florida Buildin


Florida Court Holds HDD Is Not An Abnormally Dangerous Activity; Alleged Damage to Bridge 90 Feet From HDD Bore Held Not Foreseeable As A Matter of Law

A Florida circuit court has rejected a claim by a property owner that HDD is an abnormally dangerous activity, and that the HDD contractor cannot be subjected to strict liability for damage alleged to bridge. In an earlier ruling, the court held th


Beginning April 1, FFCRA Requires Employers Of 500 Persons Or Less To Provide Paid Medical Leave To Certain Employees Affected By Covid-19 — But Only If The Employee Can’t “Telework”

The Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”) was passed by Congress and signed by the President on March 18, 2020.  (The law in question is technically titled “Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act” see H.R. 6201 §5101.  We’ll call


Florida Department of Economic Opportunity Is Pushing Out Emergency Bridge Loans to Small Business at 0% Interest For One Year

To assist small businesses to stay open and pay employees during the COVID-19 slowdown, Governor DeSantis has authorized the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity to extend 0% interest emergency bridge loans to small businesses.  The loans ar


HRKM Wins Directed Verdict in Auto Repair Professional Liability Case

An often overlooked consideration during most initial case evaluations, is the applicability of the Statute of Limitations. A prime purpose of the statute of limitations  is to protect defendants from facing surprise and stale claims which positio


HRKM Collaborates with ABC Student Chapter

Hill, Rugh, Keller & Main is proud to be a member of the largest commercial construction trade association, Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC), Central Florida Chapter. According to ABC’s website, “the Central Florida Chapter of ABC i


Statute of Limitations for Roof Defect Claim Runs from Time of Notice of Roof Leak Not Knowledge of the Specific Defect

The Third District Court of Appeal in Covenant Baptist Church, Inc. v. Vasallo Construction, Inc. in an opinion filed on May 22, 2019, held that an owner was barred by the statute of limitations from filing a lawsuit for a defective roof when th


Proposed amendment to ch. 558 would require nonbinding arbitration and allocation of damages to “own work”

During the first week of March, a bill (SB 1246/HB911) to modify the chapter 558 process by adding nonbinding arbitration was filed in the Florida House.  Proposed Sec. 558.045 would require nonbinding arbitration in any construction defect lawsuit


The Repose That Wasn’t: Florida Extends The Statute of Repose For Construction Claims By A Year (Or Maybe More)

Folklore in the construction business is that you can safely throw out your records after seven years because the IRS will only chase you for that long.  Effective July 1, 2018, people in the business need to basically double that period, because o


Protecting Your Business Domain Begins When You Select It

Check out the link below to read HRKM Owner and Partner, Chris Hill’s, Forbes magazine article.


Former Congressman Ric Keller’s T.V. Commentary on President Trump’s SOTU Address

Check out Former Congressman Ric Keller’s T.V. commentary on President Trump’s State of the Union Address (see at 1 min.)


Defending Class Action Lawsuits

Have you been served with a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) class action? If so, several questions come to mind: What is the TCPA? Why am I being sued? How do I make this TCPA lawsuit go away without destroying my business? By


Defending Property Owners When Serious Construction Accidents Happen

Has a construction worker been injured while working on your property?  If so, several questions come to mind: Will I be sued? Do I have enough insurance? Could the millions of dollars sought by plaintiffs’ attorneys for alleged wrongful death or


Is There Still A Right To Setoff Settlement Amounts Paid By A Co-Defendant In A Negligence Case Involving Multiple Defendants

Florida Statute § 768.81, titled “Comparative Fault”, provides a statutory scheme for determining damages in a “negligence action” and apportioning these damages if there are multiple parties involved.  The statute expressly defines a


Florida’s Open House Party Statute: Don’t Be The “Cool” Parents!

Many of our friends have “kids” who are in the 18-20 year old range.  Whether they are older high school students or younger college students, many of them want to have “a few friends over” to Mom and Dad’s house.  Spring Break, graduati


Attorney Ric Keller Discusses State Attorney Aramis Ayala’s Decision To Sue Governor Rick Scott

Check out Ric Keller on this morning’s Fox 35 segment as he discusses recent news of State Attorney, Aramis Ayala’s decision to sue Florida Governor, Ric Scott.


Issues To Consider If Your Personal Injury Claimant Is A Medicare Beneficiary, And Is Being Treated Under Letters Of Protection

One of the more challenging aspects of successful claims resolution arises in situations where a personal injury claimant receives medical care and treatment pursuant to letters of protection.  A letter of protection (“LOP”), of course, is an a


Construction Liens: How Do You Prove The Date Of “Final Furnishing?”

Most construction folks in Florida know that to lien a job, the lienor must file its lien within 90 days of ….something.  An unpaid lienor usually starts focusing on this question sometime after its pay application hasn’t been paid for a month


Chris Hill Receives Golden Gavel Award

HRKM Partner, Chris Hill, was recently awarded Westfield Insurance Company’s Golden Gavel Award! Presented by Jim Schumaker, the Golden Gavel was given to Chris for his outstanding handling of a claim on behalf of Westfield. We want to congratula


Happy Holidays from Everyone at HRKM

Wishing you and your family happiness this Holiday Season and throughout the coming year from all of us at Hill, Rugh, Keller & Main!


HRKM Owner, Chris Hill Participates in Charity Golf Scramble

HRKM Owner and Partner, Chris Hill and friends participated in BASE Camp Children’s Cancer Foundation‘s Golf Scramble this past weekend. HRKM was honored to sponsor this organization which supports children and their families going tho


HRKM Attorneys Attend OCBA Event in Downtown Orlando

HRKM Attorneys, Nick Patrick, Andrew Showen and Scott Reed had the privilege of attending the Orange County Bar Association’s Joint Voluntary Happy Hour in Downtown Orlando last night. Thank you to the OCBA for hosting such a great event!


Hurricane Matthew Reminded Us What Insureds Can Lose When They Give Assignments of Benefits

Hurricane Matthew has brought out repair contractors offering services to property owners who have suffered damages to their homes, businesses and condominiums.  Already we’ve seen one form of agreement between a repair contractor and a condomini


Partners & Staff of HRKM Show Support for Breast Cancer Awareness

In recognition of Breast Cancer Awareness Month, partners and staff of Hill, Rugh, Keller & Main, P.L. “pink-out” the office in Orlando. #BreastCancerAwarenessMonth #PinktoberOrlando


Employee Or Independent Contractor: What You Need To Know

The issue of whether an individual is an employee or an independent contractor for liability purposes is not always clear-cut. To resolve the issue, Florida courts apply a multifactor test, with the most important factor being the “extent of contr


HRKM Attorney’s Winning Verdict in Asian Antiques Case

Chris Hill recently won a jury trial in a commercial litigation case for a local antiques dealer.  HRKM filed suit on behalf of a family-owned Winter Park company, seeking to collect more than $1 million from purchasers located in Chicago.  Th


Aerial Photos Provide Inexpensive and Compelling Evidence

HRKM lawyers used aerial photography taken over time in a recent trial to prove that a property had numerous gaps in a fence line which the plaintiff claimed was secure.  In the above photo from property appraiser’s public records, one can se


HRKM Staff Attends Popular Networking Event in Orlando

Partner, Ric Keller and staff of HRKM had the privilege of attending TCU Construction’s Networking Event at Bar Louie last Thursday. Our staff had an amazing time meeting everyone who participated in this occasion!


HRKM Lawyers Recover Costs From Plaintiff After Dismissal of Warehouse Fire Case

Chris Hill and Andy Showen secured a judgment of dismissal at the close of plaintiff’s case in a Federal court trial in Orlando in December 2015.  The court taxed defense costs against the plaintiff of over $17,000 in post-trial proceedings, whic


Can Legal Draftsmanship Fix The Florida Constitution Statute of Repose Problem?

We often hear that Florida has a ten year statute of repose for claims arising out of construction.[1]  Contractors design their risk management plans (such as they are) assuming there is an absolute ten year bar against lawsuits.  But the ten yea


“What Do You Mean We Have To Go To Pennsylvania To Enforce Our Warranty?”: Roof Replacement, Venue Clauses, Warranty Limitations, And Other Pitfalls In Condominium Repair Contracts

The Life and Death of a Roof: A condominium building with a low-slope roof (commonly but incorrectly referred to as a “flat” roof) will need a reroof every seven to twenty years. This is a major budget item that can cost from $8 to $15 per squar


Performance Bonds , Indemnity Agreements and Contractor’s Spouses

Building contractors often have to provide performance bonds to owners. Do their spouses understand they are cosigning for those bonds and may lose their homes and personal assets when obtaining the bond? Contractors’ spouses’ risk on bon